Re: jury nullification, jury veto, jury pardon

"Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Larry Smith"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >"Robert H. Risch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 14:01:46 GMT, John Husvar
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> >> 1. The defendant can be tried by the same party that tried him in the
> >> first place, if they can find another statute covering the same
> >> criminal behavior but needing the proof of at least one different fact
> >> in order to establish guilt.
> >>
> >> 2.  Another state
> >
> >Huh?   Give examples.   I've never heard of this one before.
>
> Why is this not surprising.
>
> Suppose A kidnaps B in New York, transports B to NEw Jersey, and keeps her
> hostage there for a week.  Both states can try A on kidnapping charges.

Yep, and let's not forget that since state lines were crossed the federal
government can try them as well..

One crime.....three trials.