Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Binaries Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: HELL PREACHERS INC - "SUPREME PSYCHEDELIC UNDERGROUND"



"Mik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So let them waste their money. I still remain convinced, so we'll beg to
> differ.
> Cheers,
> Mik.
> "Brian Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Mik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Top posting fixed.
> >
> > > "Brian Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > "Mik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Well here it is. I've been a Purple fan since the early 70s and
had
> > > always
> > > > > been aware of the existence of an album by them under a different
> name
> > > in
> > > > > the late 60s. Finally got hold of it in the late 80s, but now feel
> > it's
> > > > time to let go (coupled with the demands of twin
> > > > > daughters!!)..
> > > > >
> > > > > Have spent years researching this one and have read differing
> opinions
> > > > about
> > > > > if it was them or not. Sorry, you disbelievers, but there is NO
WAY
> > this
> > > > ISN
> > > > > 'T them! The sound and the style is SO Purple Circa late 60s, it's
> > silly
> > > > to
> > > > > think it could be anyone else.
> > > >
> > > > I have it too and it occasionally gets put on the deck at parties
(for
> a
> > > > laugh).
> > > >
> > > > (A) it isn't Deep Purple, (B) it's a bunch of session men, (C) it's
a
> > pile
> > > > of poo.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone paying more than a couple of quid for it (to cover postage)
is
> > > > throwing their money away.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry to burst yer bubble.
> >
> > > (A) Yes it is, (B) No it isn't, (C) Yes, you're right.
> > > Bubble remains intact.
> >
> > > PS. Why would a group of session musicians want to cover a band who
had
> a
> > > solitary US hit and moderate sales elsewhere at the time?
> >
> > They aren't covering Deep Purple. It is just a "generic loud pop" cover
> > album (and crap).
> >
> > There were lots of bands playing stuff like it at the time and,
according
> to
> > their line up and skill, getting results from the very wonderful at one
> > extreme to Hell Preachers Inc at the other.
> >
> > > Have been
> > > listening to Blackmore since 'Little Brown Jug' days and the sound and
> > > playing technique is just TOO close to not be him.
> >
> > It's not him and anyone who buys it on the basis of it being him is
> wasting
> > their money.
> >
> > --
> > Brian
> > "Style advisor to the seasonally-challenged"
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 06/11/2003
>
>





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.