
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
(A) Yes it is, (B) No it isn't, (C) Yes, you're right. Bubble remains intact. Cheers, Mik PS. Why would a group of session musicians want to cover a band who had a solitary US hit and moderate sales elsewhere at the time? Have been listening to Blackmore since 'Little Brown Jug' days and the sound and playing technique is just TOO close to not be him. "Brian Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Mik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Well here it is. I've been a Purple fan since the early 70s and had always > > been aware of the existence of an album by them under a different name in > > the late 60s. Finally got hold of it in the late 80s, but now feel it's > time to let go (coupled with the demands of twin > > daughters!!).. > > > > Have spent years researching this one and have read differing opinions > about > > if it was them or not. Sorry, you disbelievers, but there is NO WAY this > ISN > > 'T them! The sound and the style is SO Purple Circa late 60s, it's silly > to > > think it could be anyone else. > > I have it too and it occasionally gets put on the deck at parties (for a > laugh). > > (A) it isn't Deep Purple, (B) it's a bunch of session men, (C) it's a pile > of poo. > > Anyone paying more than a couple of quid for it (to cover postage) is > throwing their money away. > > Sorry to burst yer bubble. > > Why not keep it and put it on at *your* parties? > > -- > Brian > "Don't be afraid of playing the fool, or of letting go, or of not being > dignified, or of not being pretty, or of not being conventional, or of > thinking that someone will laugh" > > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 06/11/2003
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |