
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
下面是在英文的「古典音樂討論版」所看到的討論。請問有誰知道 "HIP" movement是 什麼?好像是有關用古樂器演奏古曲的「運動」。 有空請到 www.yentzu.idv.tw. 坐坐 "Sightreader" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I hear period instruments and style advocated as >a way of solving various problems in clarity and >balance lost by using modern instruments. > >Is this the only way to regain those values? Rather >than moving everything back 200 years, can't we >advance instrument design and performance style >*forward* instead? Can't we try to get the best of >both worlds by reinventing instrument design and >playing technique rather than insisting that you >choose from existing traditions that are either 50 >or 200 years old? Well, yes and no. It is useful to look at history, where you see alternating periods of progress and regression, Renaissance and Dark Age, with an occasional cataclysmic collapse that probably more or less erases the affected civilization. The key to this is, each Renaissance is sparked by a renewed interest in the previous ones, and if you master the ideas that made them possible, you are in a position to improve upon them. This goes for art as well as science; nothing of consequence is arbitrary. Much of the so-called "HIP" movement is bogus, and many of the performances are sterile. However, there is something to be learned from the old construction of instruments (violin builders are still debating the secrets of Stradivari, Amadi and Guarnari); the one quality that has been lost from particularly the winds and keyboards is the quality of registration, where the instrument, in imitation of the well-trained human voice, has distinctive shifts in tone color as it passes from one register to another. There is a recording that I find particularly instructive, of Paul Badura-Skoda playing Mozart's C Minor Fantasy on a forte-piano. The register shifts are very pronounced, and you can hear how the composer took them into account. So, if we are to begin correcting the defects in modern instrument building (and modern composition), we must begin by identifying crucial knowledge which has been lost. eusebius7 Davidsbuendler http://members.aol.com/buendler
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |