Re: Evidence of God

On 1 Dec 2003 13:59:20 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Al Evan), Message
ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
alt.atheism;

>386sx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> Al Evan writes:
>> 
>> > I never argued that there are 'gods.'
>> 
>> The real issue here, for you, is, when did they argue that there are no
>> gods?
>> 
>> Or, as one of your "wiser" USENET apologist compadres once proclaimed,
>> 
>> "No true atheist claims that there is no god.  :-)"
>
>
>386sx:
>     That is my exact point:  "No true atheist claims that there is no god."  
>What's yours?

Sorry, but the claim can be made and supported, if one cared enough to
do so.  Such is no different than saying; "There is no Santa Claus."

If you expect those outside your superstition to consider it important
then you'd best not only come up with concise definitions and objective
supporting evidence for each claim made.  Until then, there is nothing
to look for or examine.
         

   
             Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
               and
          SCAMPERMEISTER!"

When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert

alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}