Re: Evidence of God

On 21 Nov 2003 16:35:42 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (whysohard)
wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> On 21 Nov 2003 00:32:21 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (whysohard)
>> wrote:
snip
>> >>>>>>>This is a good example of the wisdom of men.Since by their own decision
>> >> > > to be an athiest, they gain faith in something else. Everyone has to 
>> >> > > believe they have an origin, so the same applies
>>  . only those with no wisdom would believe such a silly thing......
>> >> > > The author of the above line should be commended for proving their 
>> >> > > own silliness, as you can apply any faith to it.
>> 
>> 
>> Despite your erroneous conception of atheism, I do not have a faith.
>> I see absolutely no sense in basing a belief in anything on faith.
>> Believing something in spite of their being no evidence for it and in
>> spite of it being irrational is silly, and you have provided no
>> argument against that.
>> 
>> 
>> None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
>> "But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
>
>
>


>> >If you don't have a faith, then you have no faith in athiesm,
>> > since athiesm cannot be proved to be correct-beyond reasonable doubt.
>> > So you are an athiest by faith, despite the conception, are you not?
>>



No I am not.  Atheism is not the positive claim of anything, so there
is nothing to have faith in.  I am 100% certain that I have no faith
in any god, and that is all atheism is.


None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.