Re: Evidence of God

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 21 Nov 2003 00:32:21 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (whysohard)
> wrote:
> 
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> On 18 Nov 2003 17:37:14 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (whysohard)
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Libertarius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >> "David V." wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > John Hattan wrote:
> >> >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> 
> >> snip
> >> 
> >> 
> >> >>>>>>All of this talk is very amusing to me as a believer, though I wonder-
> >> >> > >If GODS wisdom is foolishness to you, 
> >> 
>  
> >> Obviously an atheist does not believe that it is god's wisdom.
> >> 
>  
> >> 
> >> 
> >> and you can't understand HIS 
> >> >> > > foolishness, why do you spend so much energy on research about
> >> >> > >it.You seem dabble in everything.Wouldn't your wisdom be better applied
> >> >> > >to something more constructive, after all, we will believe by faith and 
> >> >> > >not by wisdom of men.
> >> 
>  
> >> Only those with no wisdom would do such a silly thing.
> >
> 
> 
> >
> >>>>>>>This is a good example of the wisdom of men.Since by their own decision
> >> > > to be an athiest, they gain faith in something else. Everyone has to 
> >> > > believe they have an origin, so the same applies
>  . only those with no wisdom would believe such a silly thing......
> >> > > The author of the above line should be commended for proving their 
> >> > > own silliness, as you can apply any faith to it.
> 
> 
> Despite your erroneous conception of atheism, I do not have a faith.
> I see absolutely no sense in basing a belief in anything on faith.
> Believing something in spite of their being no evidence for it and in
> spite of it being irrational is silly, and you have provided no
> argument against that.
> 
> 
> None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
> "But he has got nothing on," said a little child.



> >If you don't have a faith, then you have no faith in athiesm,
> > since athiesm cannot be proved to be correct-beyond reasonable doubt.
> > So you are an athiest by faith, despite the conception, are you not?
>
>