Re: Evidence of God

On 21 Nov 2003 00:32:21 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (whysohard)
wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> On 18 Nov 2003 17:37:14 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (whysohard)
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >Libertarius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >> "David V." wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > John Hattan wrote:
>> >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 
>> snip
>> 
>> 
>> >>>>>>All of this talk is very amusing to me as a believer, though I wonder-
>> >> > >If GODS wisdom is foolishness to you, 
>> 

>> Obviously an atheist does not believe that it is god's wisdom.
>> 

>> 
>> 
>> and you can't understand HIS 
>> >> > > foolishness, why do you spend so much energy on research about
>> >> > >it.You seem dabble in everything.Wouldn't your wisdom be better applied
>> >> > >to something more constructive, after all, we will believe by faith and 
>> >> > >not by wisdom of men.
>> 

>> Only those with no wisdom would do such a silly thing.
>


>
>>>>>>>This is a good example of the wisdom of men.Since by their own decision
>> > > to be an athiest, they gain faith in something else. Everyone has to 
>> > > believe they have an origin, so the same applies
> > > . only those with no wisdom would believe such a silly thing......
>> > > The author of the above line should be commended for proving their 
>> > > own silliness, as you can apply any faith to it.


Despite your erroneous conception of atheism, I do not have a faith.
I see absolutely no sense in basing a belief in anything on faith.
Believing something in spite of their being no evidence for it and in
spite of it being irrational is silly, and you have provided no
argument against that.


None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.