Re: Evidence of God

millertime wrote:

> I don't understand why "lewd and lacivious 
> acts with a child" should call for 8 years
> in prison (re. Michael Jackson's recent bust.)
<snipped>
> Does anyone know what "lewd and lacivious" is
> exactly? I'll look it up.

Um... shouldn't you have looked it up before
complaning about how harshly it is punished?

Obviously, I'm not a lawyer, but ISTR from
newspaper articles that "L&LB" could refer
to anything from rape to flashing.

socode