Re: Logia

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 00:59:00 -0400, "stephen bayzik"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"David V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> stephen bayzik wrote:
>
>> > Just a wee bit of information regarding the Gospels.
>
>> All one needs to know is that the authors are unknown and
>> they aren't worth the bother to read.
>
>> Why waste time trying to prove the "gospels" false when it
>> is plainly, and painfully, obvious that they are false. They
>> don't matter anyway! It's useless to claim what a god wants,
>> or says, until the god is proven to exist.
>
>The question  (to a rational and educated person) is not true or false. The
>Christian gospels are literary monuments to be studied as well as the
>Tanoak, the Quran, Vedas etc. Failure to do so would at best make one a
>functional illiterate.

Nobody would bother with "true or false" - it obly Christians didn't
claim they are true, attempt to use tham as "proof" of anything etc.

They are simply irrelevant as what Christians imagine they are.

>PS. notice I am not engaging in an argument on the nature (or existence) of
>God, gods, the Christ.