Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Evidences of God



"stoney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 00:21:27 +0200, "Chain Smoker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in alt.atheism;
>
> >"stoney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:12:48 +0200, "Chain Smoker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >> Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in alt.atheism;
> >>
> >> >"stoney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:45:08 GMT, Steve Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >> >> Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> >> >> alt.atheism;
> >> >>
> >> >> >On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 02:39:48 GMT, Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >snip
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>I believe that God does exist.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >   Believe is the operative word. Then it's followed by 'the
argument
> >> >> >from insert evidence here__________'.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >   There has never been a compelling evidence for a god or gods. If
> >> >> >there were, we would all be believers of the same religion and you
> >> >> >wouldn't have to waste your time looking for converts.
> >> >>
> >> >> First there's a need to have a coherant definition for the g-o-d
letter
> >> >> string.  Then objective supporting evidence for the critter's
existance
> >> >> can be shown followed by objective supporting evidence for each
> >> >> assertion made.
> >> >>
> >> >> Theists love to piss upwind.
> >> >
> >> >Whereas the insane love to reply to their own Usenet postings
repeatedly.
> >>
> >> Which leaves me out, what's your excuse?
> >
> >It took you a day and a half to come up with this lame retort?
>
> Oh silly one.  Messages hit servers at different times and I don't sit
> connected to the newsgroup all day.  I have other things to do.
>
> > In case you
> >missed my point, you replied repleatedly to your own posts in this
thread.
>
> Not at all.  As I said, messages hit servers at different times.
>
> Here's the message ID of the post I made from which you state I
> repeatedly replied to my own posts.
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> /quote
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:45:08 GMT, Steve Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> alt.atheism;
>
> >On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 02:39:48 GMT, Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >snip
> >
> >>I believe that God does exist.
> >
> >   Believe is the operative word. Then it's followed by 'the argument
> >from insert evidence here__________'.
> >
> >   There has never been a compelling evidence for a god or gods. If
> >there were, we would all be believers of the same religion and you
> >wouldn't have to waste your time looking for converts.
>
> First there's a need to have a coherant definition for the g-o-d letter
> string.  Then objective supporting evidence for the critter's existance
> can be shown followed by objective supporting evidence for each
> assertion made.
>
> Theists love to piss upwind.
>
> /end quote
>
> >You may not be insane, but this behavior does seem to fall in line with
> >insanity.  Your sad attempt to turn the tables on me fails because I do
not
> >exhibit this strange behavior.
>
> (laughing at you)  Grovelling before a bronze age
> 'monster-under-the-bed' has zero to do with rationality.

As for your apparent posting numerous responses to yourself, I suppose you
may be right.  Maybe that's one of the consequences of crossposting an
argument like this one.  One or more of the participants may appear to one
or more bystanders to be arguing with himself, depending on what newsgroups
the various participants' news servers will post to and which they won't.
It does create an effect, though, that makes the one poster you can see seem
looney.

About God, you can laugh at me as much as you like.  It makes no difference.
He won't become any less real just because you wish He would.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.520 / Virus Database: 318 - Release Date: 9/18/2003





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.