Re: Evidences of God

"stoney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:12:48 +0200, "Chain Smoker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in alt.atheism;
>
> >"stoney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:45:08 GMT, Steve Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >> Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> >> alt.atheism;
> >>
> >> >On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 02:39:48 GMT, Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >snip
> >> >
> >> >>I believe that God does exist.
> >> >
> >> >   Believe is the operative word. Then it's followed by 'the argument
> >> >from insert evidence here__________'.
> >> >
> >> >   There has never been a compelling evidence for a god or gods. If
> >> >there were, we would all be believers of the same religion and you
> >> >wouldn't have to waste your time looking for converts.
> >>
> >> First there's a need to have a coherant definition for the g-o-d letter
> >> string.  Then objective supporting evidence for the critter's existance
> >> can be shown followed by objective supporting evidence for each
> >> assertion made.
> >>
> >> Theists love to piss upwind.
> >
> >Whereas the insane love to reply to their own Usenet postings repeatedly.
>
> Which leaves me out, what's your excuse?

It took you a day and a half to come up with this lame retort?  In case you
missed my point, you replied repleatedly to your own posts in this thread.
You may not be insane, but this behavior does seem to fall in line with
insanity.  Your sad attempt to turn the tables on me fails because I do not
exhibit this strange behavior.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.520 / Virus Database: 318 - Release Date: 9/19/2003