Re: Evidences of God

"stoney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:45:08 GMT, Steve Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> alt.atheism;
>
> >On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 02:39:48 GMT, Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >snip
> >
> >>I believe that God does exist.
> >
> >   Believe is the operative word. Then it's followed by 'the argument
> >from insert evidence here__________'.
> >
> >   There has never been a compelling evidence for a god or gods. If
> >there were, we would all be believers of the same religion and you
> >wouldn't have to waste your time looking for converts.
>
> First there's a need to have a coherant definition for the g-o-d letter
> string.  Then objective supporting evidence for the critter's existance
> can be shown followed by objective supporting evidence for each
> assertion made.
>
> Theists love to piss upwind.

Whereas the insane love to reply to their own Usenet postings repeatedly.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.520 / Virus Database: 318 - Release Date: 9/18/2003