Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Evidences of God -- ZOROASTRIAN -- MOSES



On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:31:43 GMT, georgann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted in alt.atheism:

>>> It says they shouldn't eat shellfish ... which for all desert peoples sounds
>>> damn practical. 

>"Al Klein" wrote:

>> Why?  Would a desert dweller get sick if he ate shellfish?

>georgann, Teflon/Bulova apologist wrote:

>That far away from the water from which it came it was bound to be rancid.

So was salt-water fish.  Shellfish doesn't turn rancid any faster than
fin fish.

>They didn't have ice, ice boxes or refrigerators in those days ya know.

Not for shellfish and not for fin fish.  But there's no prohibition
against eating salt water fin fish.

Try again.
-- 
"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid
consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and
ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who
works on the basis of reward and punishment. "
- Letter to M. Berkowitz, October 25, 1950; Einstein Archive 59-215 
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.