Re: Evidences of God -- ZOROASTRIAN -- MOSES

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:32:08 GMT, Libertarius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted in
alt.atheism:

>> >> georgann, Teflon/Bulova apologist wrote:

>> >> Any good Christian considers them of equal importance.

>> "Al Klein" wrote:

>> > If you did you'd consider the NT to be a violation of the OT god's
>> > commandment to not change anything about the bible.

>> georgann, Teflon/Bulova apologist wrote:

>> Using the most specific verses possible, exactly what of the OT was changed
>> by the New?

If there's a word in the NT that's different than the OT, it's a
change.  Even if there's a jot or tittle (difficult to explain in
English - sort of an accent mark) that's different, it's a violation
of your god's order to not change as much as a jot or tittle.

>===>Deuteronomy 6:4
> "Hear, O Israel! The LORD is our God, the LORD is one!

Not exactly, Lib.  More like "The Lord our god is one god."
-- 
"To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains
premature today."
- Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net