
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph Geloso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:52:49 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (€ R.L. Measures) > wrote: > > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph Geloso > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 03:10:11 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (€ R.L. Measures) > >> wrote: > >> > >> >... > >> >> Saint Andrew was never in competition with his brother, Saint Peter, > >> >> for the Primacy. > >> > > >> >** the dodge. > >> > > >> >>There is still a Patriarch in Constantinople, and > >> >> when God restores to His Church the unity that is her right, that > >> >> Patriarch will be Catholic, in a state of joy. > >> > >> The Patriarch of Constantinople used to recognize the Patriarch of > >> Rome as the legitimate Pope, and one day will again. > > > >€ Then why was His Holiness called a bishop? > > He still is called a bishop -- he is the Bishop of Rome. € "Unlearned in history, they allow themselves to be governed by the Unknown Past." -- Historian John Acton -- € R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |