
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "bam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "€ R.L. Measures" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > *** During the 4th Crusade assault on Beziers, France, thousands of good > > Catholics were slaughtered along with the damned "heretics"/Albigensians. > > Good > > > A couple of centuries later, God's Holy Church herself adopted the > > Albigensian vow of priestly celibacy. > > Baloney. € The Roman church adopted the vow of celibacy in 1123AD. In the Albigensian faith, "Perfects" took a vow of celibacy well before that. > > http://www.tfp.org/TFPForum/catholic_perspective/tracing_the_glorious_origins_of_celibacy.htm € this is like listening to the Republican explanation of why Gee Dubya made a decision > > Pope Siricius answering a specific consultation about clerical celibacy in > 385 affirmed that bishops and priests who continue marital relations after > ordination violate an irrevocable law from the very inception of the Church > that binds them to continence. > > Some mistakenly conclude that St. Gregory VII introduced the law of celibacy > into the Church. Quite the contrary. What St. Gregory VII, and later the > Second Lateran Council (1139) did was not to “introduce the law of celibacy > but simply confirm that it was in force € Semi-correct. The turn-around was in AD1123 and the Church's motivation was mammon. >and issue regulations for its > observance. Since most recruiting for the priesthood was already among the > unmarried, the Second Lateran Council forbade priestly marriage, declaring > it null and void in the case of priests, deacons or anyone with a solemn vow > of religion. > > > > Raynaldus was a Cistercian monk who accompanied the army of Simon de > Montfort, one of the leaders of the crusade against the Albigensians. > > > From Raynaldus. Annales > > First it is to be known that the heretics held that there are two Creators; > viz. one of invisible things, whom they called the benevolent God, and > another of visible things, whom they named the malevolent God. The New > Testament they attributed to the benevolent God; but the Old Testament to > the malevolent God, and rejected it altogether . . . . They charged the > author of the Old Testament with falsehood, because the Creator said, "In > the day that ye eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil ye shall > die;" nor (as they say) after eating did they die; when, in fact, after the > eating of the forbidden fruit they were subjected to the misery of death. > They also call him [i.e. the god of the Old Testament] a homicide, as well > because he burned up Sodom and Gomorrah, and destroyed the world by the > waters of the deluge, as because he overwhelmed Pharaoh, and the Egyptians, > in the sea. They affirmed also, that all the fathers of the Old Testament > were damned; that John the Baptist was one of the greater demons. They said > also, in their secret doctrine (in secreto suo), that that Christ who was > born in the visible, and terrestrial Bethlehem, and crucified in Jerusalem, > was a bad man, and that Mary Magdalene was his concubine; and that she was > the woman taken in adultery, of whom we read in the gospel. For the good > Christ, as they said, never ate, nor drank, nor took upon him true flesh, > nor ever was in this world, except spiritually in the body of Paul .... > > They said that almost all the Church of Rome was a den of thieves; and that > it was the harlot of which we read in the Apocalypse. € ³Take it as a rule, the nearer a nation dwells to the Roman Curia, the less religion it has.² - Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) >They so far annulled > the sacraments of the Church, as publicly to teach that the water of holy > Baptism was just the same as river water, and that the Host of the most holy > body of Christ did not differ from common bread; instilling into the ears of > the simple this blasphemy, that the body of Christ, even though it had been > as great as the Alps, would have been long ago consumed, and annihilated by > those who had eaten of it. Confirmation and Confession, they considered as > altogether vain and frivolous. They preached that Holy Matrimony was > meretricious, and that none could be saved in it, if they should beget > children. Denying also the Resurrection of the flesh, they invented some > unheard of notions, saying, that our souls are those of angelic spirits who, > being cast down from heaven by the apostasy of pride, left their glorified > bodies in the air; and that these souls themselves, after successively > inhabiting seven terrene bodies, of one sort or another, having at length > fulfilled their penance, return to those deserted [glorified] bodies. > > It is also to be known that some among the heretics were called "perfect" or > "good men;" others "believers" of the heretics. Those who were called > perfect, wore a black dress, falsely pretended to chastity, abhorred the > eating of flesh, eggs and cheese, wished to appear not liars, when they were > continually telling lies, chiefly respecting God. They said also that they > ought not on any account to swear. > > Those were called believers of the heretics, who lived after the manner of > the world, and who though they did not attain so far as to imitate the life > of the perfect, nevertheless hoped to be saved in their faith; and though > they differed as to their mode of life, they were one with them in belief > and unbelief. Those who were called believers of the heretics were given to > usury, rapine, homicide, lust, perjury and every vice; and they, in fact, > sinned with more security, and less restraint, because they believed that > without restitution, without confession and penance, they should be saved, > if only, when on the point of death, they could say a Paternoster, and > receive imposition of hands from the teachers. > > From Raynaldus, "Annales," in S. R. Maitland, trans., History of the > Albigenses and Waldenses (London: C. J. G. and F. Rivington, 1832), pp. > 392-394. > > € Reminds me of Rumsfeld. -- € R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |