Re: Purgatory?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ":+D" <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 07:55:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (€ R.L. Measures)
> wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet News'Froups! :
> 
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ":+D" <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 03:40:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (€ R.L. Measures)
> >> wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet News'Froups! :
> >> 
> >> >> >
> >> >> I most certainly WAS, thank you.
> >> >> 
> >> >...
> >> >€  Was the bacteria count of the water that was used under 200ppb, and were the 
> >> >disolved minerals under 1 part in 5000?  Was the Hg / Pb analysis under 750ppb, 
> >> >combined?  What was the temperature of the water and it's conductivity in 
> >> >ohm-cm^3?   Thanks.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Not only that, but it was WET too! :o)
> >> --
> >**  Sounds pretty damn good to me, the Pb spec is a toughie.  However, to play it 
> >extra-safe, you might consider contributing a monthly  "Love Gift" to the local 
> >defense fund for priests to help pay for the "love" they got from little ones.
> 
> 
> I wouldn't give those pedos a lousy CENT.
> --
**  Do you like hot weather?

-- 
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap