Re: Purgatory?

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 07:55:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (€ R.L. Measures)
wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet News'Froups! :

>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ":+D" <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 03:40:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (€ R.L. Measures)
>> wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet News'Froups! :
>> 
>> >> >
>> >> I most certainly WAS, thank you.
>> >> 
>> >...
>> >€  Was the bacteria count of the water that was used under 200ppb, and were the 
>> >disolved minerals under 1 part in 5000?  Was the Hg / Pb analysis under 750ppb, 
>> >combined?  What was the temperature of the water and it's conductivity in 
>> >ohm-cm^3?   Thanks.
>> 
>> 
>> Not only that, but it was WET too! :o)
>> --
>**  Sounds pretty damn good to me, the Pb spec is a toughie.  However, to play it 
>extra-safe, you might consider contributing a monthly  "Love Gift" to the local 
>defense fund for priests to help pay for the "love" they got from little ones.


I wouldn't give those pedos a lousy CENT.
--


==================================================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~JESUS is the ROCK!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
==================================================