
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ":+D" <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 03:40:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (€ R.L. Measures) > wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet News'Froups! : > > >> > > >> I most certainly WAS, thank you. > >> > >... > >€ Was the bacteria count of the water that was used under 200ppb, and were the > >disolved minerals under 1 part in 5000? Was the Hg / Pb analysis under 750ppb, > >combined? What was the temperature of the water and it's conductivity in ohm-cm^3? > > Thanks. > > > Not only that, but it was WET too! :o) > -- ** Sounds pretty damn good to me, the Pb spec is a toughie. However, to play it extra-safe, you might consider contributing a monthly "Love Gift" to the local defense fund for priests to help pay for the "love" they got from little ones. -- € R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |