
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:23:48 -0800, John W <john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:14:12 -0500, Joseph Geloso >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet >>>News'Froups! : >>> >>>>and then that >>>>one would make an excellent missionary to the Baptists, having known >>>>what it is like to be a Baptist from the inside. >>> >>> >>>Why do you blindly assume a good Baptist would want to convert to >>>romanism? >> >>Romanism, if such a thing exists, no. No one should convert to that. >> >>Roman Catholicism, I sightedly know, anyone who seeks the Truth will >>eventually find. >> >>> >>>Pretty arrogant, I would say. >> >>We have heard that many times before, but how would it be arrogant if >>the Church is simply the Truth from God? Would it not then rather be >>the height of arrogance to remain a Baptist? >> >>I call Baptists, "Baptists." Would it be too much to ask, to get you >>to call Catholics "Catholics?" > >You say that you are Roman Catholic, that the RCC is THE church, and >that you follow the Bible. Yet when you gave your long discourse, you >barely mentioned the Bible. Which is supposed to prove, what exactly? >And everything you stated is contrary to >scripture. That's not true at all. You will have to support a statement like that, or at least make the attempt. How does anything I've written contradict the Scriptures? Be specific. > Is something wrong with this picture? well, my monitor is a little fuzzy, but if I have trouble reading the newsgroup. I copy and paste in to notepad and that usually solves the difficulty. Are you having similar troubles with your monitor? ;-p
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |