
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
x-no-archive:yes On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:03:18 -0500, Joseph Geloso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: x-no-archive:yes >On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:20:08 -0500, "Pope Watson 1st ;O) " ><<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:14:12 -0500, Joseph Geloso >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet >>News'Froups! : >> >>>and then that >>>one would make an excellent missionary to the Baptists, having known >>>what it is like to be a Baptist from the inside. >> >> >>Why do you blindly assume a good Baptist would want to convert to >>romanism? > >Romanism, if such a thing exists, no. No one should convert to that. > >Roman Catholicism, I sightedly know, anyone who seeks the Truth will >eventually find. > >> >>Pretty arrogant, I would say. > >We have heard that many times before, but how would it be arrogant if >the Church is simply the Truth from God? Would it not then rather be >the height of arrogance to remain a Baptist? > >I call Baptists, "Baptists." Would it be too much to ask, to get you >to call Catholics "Catholics?" You say that you are Roman Catholic, that the RCC is THE church, and that you follow the Bible. Yet when you gave your long discourse, you barely mentioned the Bible. And everything you stated is contrary to scripture. Is something wrong with this picture? John W
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |