
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:38:59 -0500, Joseph Geloso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet News'Froups! : >On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:09:03 -0500, "Pope Watson 1st ;O) " ><<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >>On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 02:44:40 -0500, Joseph Geloso >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet >>News'Froups! : >> >>> >>>>Why would it be? The Baptist Church teaches BIBLICALLY. >>> >>>Parts of the Bible, anyway. >> >>ALL of it. > >It does seem to me that if you were learning from (as opposed to >teaching) the whole Bible, you would be Catholic. Hardly. If I wanted to be a roman catholic, I would have joined the romish denomination. > >As to His Church, it seems obvious that He did found it, and that it >is therefore not manmade. Denominations, yes, are man-made, but that >is the division of the Church, not the Church herself. Of the Church, >Our Lord spoke that He founded it on Rock, and that the Gates of Hell >would never prevail. So it stands to reason that that Church must >still exist on Earth, > The roman catholic church is not the church founded by Christ, regardless of some claims made by roman catholic members. As for the ROCK, Jesus Christ IS THE ROCK. And this entire world will be destroyed, so where would any rock you refer to be left standing? >>>>>I call Baptists, "Baptists." Would it be too much to ask, to get you >>>>>to call Catholics "Catholics?" >>>> >>>>Of course not. I'd be delighted to if the romish ARROGANCE and >>>>bullying tactics were to cease. >>> >>>"Bullying tactics?" If I have bullied you in the past, I'm sorry. God >>>helps me to see more of my own sins and make reparation for them. >>> >>Not so much you bullying, no, and I apologize for sounding like I was >>marking you in particular. > >Don't worry about it. :-) > >>You are one of the most polite Roman Catholics in here. there are >>some, such as Bruce, Earl Weber, bam-bam, Cathy Hall, and a few others >>who are blatantly ignorant, false accusers, and liars to boot. >>If they would get out of here, many people could start having more >>meaningful CHRISTIAN discussions. But heavens no- they insist on >>staying here, cluttering the Baptist group with their crap. > >Well, just have this discussion with me, then, while we are having it. >You appear to have the ability to reason. Some do not, but thank God >that you do! > Thank you. :o) I enjoy a good debate. It's the ridiculous arguing and false accusations I detest, and thus far, you have shown none of that. >> >>>> We don't need that crap here, nor do >>>>Baptists respond favorably to such bullying and prosyletizing in the >>>>Baptist faith's group. >>> >>>Well, this is, as I've pointed out, a cross-posted thread. You are >>>spreading Baptist arrogance in the Catholic group, too. >>I'm spreading the TRUTH. > >I will obviously say the same thing about me. > naturally :o) But if this crossposting ceased, so would most arguments. >>I tried numerous times to stop the crossposting, and some RC always >>added the groups I removed right back in aggain - so I stopped trying. >>The onus is one those individuals to remove 'em now. I'm not their >>servant. > >If this were not a cross-posted thread, it is unlikely that you and I >would be having this conversation, which seems to have taken a turn >for the better. > >> To a degree, yes. But some crosspost simply for the sake of creating and / or spreading an argument. >> >>I have no idea. >>But again, please accept my apology for making it appear I was linking >>you among the creeps who are so abusive. > >I do accept it, and thank you for giving it. > thanks :o) >>God bless > >And may He bless you as well! Have a good one -- ================================================== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~JESUS is the ROCK!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ==================================================
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |