
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:12:15 -0500, "Pope Watson 1st ;O) " <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:03:18 -0500, Joseph Geloso ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following funny stuff in Usenet >News'Froups! : > >> >>We have heard that many times before, but how would it be arrogant if >>the Church is simply the Truth from God? Would it not then rather be >>the height of arrogance to remain a Baptist? > >Why would it be? The Baptist Church teaches BIBLICALLY. Parts of the Bible, anyway. >Certainly, no Church is perfect on earth, and that includes both Roman >Catholicism, as well as Baptist. > >THE CHURCH is not OF this world. the CHURCH created by Christ. > >The roman religion is NOT 'THE CHURCH' founded by Christ. >It is manmade. > >So is the Baptist Church. ALL denominations are manmade. That is an interesting assumption. How did you arrive at it, or do you treat it as a priori? > >> >>I call Baptists, "Baptists." Would it be too much to ask, to get you >>to call Catholics "Catholics?" > >Of course not. I'd be delighted to if the romish ARROGANCE and >bullying tactics were to cease. "Bullying tactics?" If I have bullied you in the past, I'm sorry. God helps me to see more of my own sins and make reparation for them. > We don't need that crap here, nor do >Baptists respond favorably to such bullying and prosyletizing in the >Baptist faith's group. Well, this is, as I've pointed out, a cross-posted thread. You are spreading Baptist arrogance in the Catholic group, too. >If the members of the romish persuasion would LEAVE this group alone, >and stop their bullying, we would ALL get along much better. This thread was started by "Christ's Disciple." He is not a Catholic. You would probably know better than me whether he is a Baptist.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |