Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important)

>
>                 Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important)
>                                       
>   From: Fright Wig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Reply to: [1]Fright Wig
>   Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:15:05 GMT
>   Newsgroups:
>          [2]talk.religion.buddhism,
>          [3]alt.zen,
>          [4]alt.religion.buddhism.tibetan
>   Followup to: [5]newsgroups
>   References:
>          [6]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [7]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [8]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [9]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [10]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [11]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [12]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [13]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [14]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [15]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [16]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [17]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>          [18]<aw
>Evelyn Ruut wrote:
>
>> ";"'''--=+)([EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> [19]news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > He can't drag you anywhere unless you allow him to do it. What is really
>> at
>> > issue here ? Is it really the way Fooey posts, or is it the reactions that
>> > he gets ? These reactions are all voluntary. Fooey is not over at your
>> house
>> > with a gun at your head forcing you to respond to his posts. You have
>> taken
>> > what he has done personally and the only one who will derive grief and
>> allow
>> > voluntary self-sabotage is you by taking things personally. Even if
>> someone
>> > intends something towards you personally, you are never forced to accept
>> it
>> > as such. It is not necessarily Fooey's actions that are suspect here but
>> the
>> > motivational reasons behind your and other's complete and utter
>> willingness
>> > to be affected by what he does. What type of juice are you getting out of
>> > this volleying back and forth of what others do to you ?
>>
>> This may also have something to do with why we post on usenet at all.
>>
>> I am replying with a quote:
>>
>> "Like the Lotus which cannot grow not on high ground but only in low marshy
>> land, those who have entered nirvana by cutting off all klesa (defilement)
>> will not develop into Buddhahood; whereas sentient beings in the mire of
>> klesa eventually will. Like paddy seeds that cannot grow in space but only
>> in manured fields; those who have cut off all klesa cannot progress into the
>> Buddha Dharma whereas beings whose klesa are endless may one day do so. Thus
>> all kinds of klesa are the seeds of the Tathagata. This is like a man who
>> cannot obtain precious pearls if he does not dive into the sea. Likewise, a
>> man who does not dive into the sea of klesa will never find the pearl of
>> savajna."
>>
>> ??? <Vimalakirti-nirdesa Sutra>
>>
>
>One Need Only......Read......Your Posts......To See.......The Muddy
>Depths.......Of  Such........Hypocrisy........
>


    we don't call her EvilRot fer nothing, ya know    :)

    
        bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!    ha!