Re: What Buddha said about trolls expounding views

"Riglin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "cupcake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >     Pema Ballerina wrote:
> >
> > >"m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&eye.com> wrote in message
> [10]news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >om>...
> > >> Evelyn Ruut wrote in message ...
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >someone obsessed with labels such as "shamanism" who also forges
> > >>  other
> > >> >peoples posts has no space to talk about anyones practices.
> > >>
> > >> evelyn dear, please do calm down. maybe you are just paranoid. i
> > >> know you don't like ch'an fu but there is no proof he did this.
> > >>
> > >> i do not.. repeat... do not believe that anyone from this
> > >> newgroup would do such a thing.
> > >
> > >  chan fu did it to me a couple of weeks ago, so she is not being
> > >paranoid, she is simply stating a fact.
> > >>
> > >> please don't get mad... i say this with heart felt sincerity for
> > >> your well being... but i'm worried about you evelyn. your
> > >> obsessing over ch'an fu and the "trolls" is becoming too real.
> > >>
> > >
> > >  it's more a case of your not having the benefit of the history on
> > >these boards. to find the paranoid people, just look to the ones who
> > >fear tibetan buddhism so much that they must try to stamp it out. a
> > >much better source of emotional problems. they see demons everywhere.
> > >
> >
> >      well, it's juzt too bad, Pema sweetie  --  but when yu've
> >      got a bad product the buying public juzt isn't gonna
> >      go for it   --   we're talking "market forces" here
> >      Pema sweetie, and we trolls are juzt consumer advocates
> >
> >             :)
> >
>
> Tell me cupcake, why are you against tibetan buddhism? Why did Chan said
> it's not buddhism? Is the reason because of the lineage? rituals? or
> chantings?
>


Get a clue, amigo.
It's...because....they don't.....like us........
gay boys. :(



> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >Evelyn
> > >> >
> > >> >(To reply to me personally, remove sox)
> > >> >
> > >> >
>
>