Re: What Buddha said about trolls expounding views

"cupcake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>     Pema Ballerina wrote:
>
> >"m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&eye.com> wrote in message
[10]news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >om>...
> >> Evelyn Ruut wrote in message ...
> >>
> >> >
> >> >someone obsessed with labels such as "shamanism" who also forges
> >>  other
> >> >peoples posts has no space to talk about anyones practices.
> >>
> >> evelyn dear, please do calm down. maybe you are just paranoid. i
> >> know you don't like ch'an fu but there is no proof he did this.
> >>
> >> i do not.. repeat... do not believe that anyone from this
> >> newgroup would do such a thing.
> >
> >  chan fu did it to me a couple of weeks ago, so she is not being
> >paranoid, she is simply stating a fact.
> >>
> >> please don't get mad... i say this with heart felt sincerity for
> >> your well being... but i'm worried about you evelyn. your
> >> obsessing over ch'an fu and the "trolls" is becoming too real.
> >>
> >
> >  it's more a case of your not having the benefit of the history on
> >these boards. to find the paranoid people, just look to the ones who
> >fear tibetan buddhism so much that they must try to stamp it out. a
> >much better source of emotional problems. they see demons everywhere.
> >
>
>      well, it's juzt too bad, Pema sweetie  --  but when yu've
>      got a bad product the buying public juzt isn't gonna
>      go for it   --   we're talking "market forces" here
>      Pema sweetie, and we trolls are juzt consumer advocates
>
>             :)
>

Tell me cupcake, why are you against tibetan buddhism? Why did Chan said
it's not buddhism? Is the reason because of the lineage? rituals? or
chantings?


>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >Evelyn
> >> >
> >> >(To reply to me personally, remove sox)
> >> >
> >> >