
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Obviously, that passage would have been written before the Will and Testament and revised later in accord with that Testament. I assume that would have occurred under the supervision of Shoghi Effendi. I was not aware that there were changes from an earlier edition. Interesting... Jeffrey "Randy Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Robert Arvay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The paper trail left by the Baha'is of yore is damning. > > The response by the Baha'is of today is a deafening silence. > > Not necessarily. The original passage read as follows: > > "Baha'u'llah further arranged that after the death of Abdu'l-Baha an > international spiritual assembly (Baytu'l-'Adl), representative of all > Baha'is throughout the world, should be appointed to take charge of the > affairs of the Cause, to control and co-ordinate all its activities, prevent > divisions and schisms, and preserve the teachings from corruption and > misrepresentation. > > "Moreover, Baha'u'llah expressly forbade interpretation of the teachings by > anyone but Abdu'l-Baha, and after him the International Baytu'l-Adl. In the > Book of Aqdas he declared that all explanations or interpretations of the > sacred texts contrary to the obvious sense thereof are forbidden. In a > 'thousand or thousands of years' another Manifestation will appear, under > the shadow of Baha'u'llah, with clear proofs of His Mission, but until then > the words of Baha'u'llah and Abdu'l-Baha and the decisions of the > International Baytu'l-Adl constitute the authorities to which all believers > must turn for guidance. No Baha'i may found a school or sect based on any > particular interpretation of the teachings or any supposed divine > revelation. Anyone contravening these injunctions is considered a > 'Covenant-breaker' or 'Naqiz.' > > This passage above is from the original Baha'u'llah and the New Era by > Esselmont, the first US edition of 1927, mostly reviewed by Abdu'l-Baha and > Shoghi Effendi, before the passages about the Guardian that Barbara quoted > were inserted. In other words the passages that Barbara quoted were > themselves interpolations. > > Cheers, Randy > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barbara) wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > > > "The spiritual or Providential character of the Faith...is further > > > exemplified in the continuance, after 'Abdu'l-Baha, of the office of > > > interpreter of the Sacred Writings in the person of the successive > > > Guardians provided in 'Abdu'l-Baha's Testament. The Faith, therefore, > > > throughout its era will never suffer the disintegrating influence of > > > schisms resulting from differences of interpretation, nor the > > > deterioration which follows when generally prevalent materialism > > > substitutes lower values for those revealed by the Founder. In > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |