
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > You are away off subject. No one ever suggested Barney Leith > repudicated DR Kelly's Bahai membership. If you opened your eyes last > time to read fred's website here. > http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Kelly100502.htm > I recommmend you go and get a good pair of glasses this time before > you attempt to read it................Errol > "After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly decided to repudiated and scapegoat him." --- First message, from Errol the liar, in the thread "BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair", posted on 27th November 2003 http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=a38fb763.0311270222.113cd5de%40posting.google.com I take it, liar, that this is you finally admitting that there is *no* repudiating or scapegoating going on here? This is after you have maintain the opposite throughout the last week. Yes? You *don't* believe that Baha'is "repudiated and scapegoated" Dr Kelly any more? GOOD. Then stop posting message that say the Baha'is did repudiate and scapegoat him then! Paul
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |