Re: BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> You are away off subject. No one ever suggested Barney Leith
> repudicated DR Kelly's Bahai membership.

"After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly decided
to repudiated and scapegoat him."
Anonymous Space Alien, using George's computer, 27 November 2003
from first message in thread titled BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly
Affair':
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=a38fb763.0311270222.113cd5de%40posting.google.com



> If you opened your eyes last
> time to read fred's website here.

Why would anyone want to go somewhere to read Fred's quotations of your
nonsense on David Kelly, when we can read your quotations of Fred's
nonsense on David Kelly, right here?

>
> http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Kelly100502.htm
> I recommmend you go and get a good pair of glasses this time before
> you attempt to read it................Errol
>

George, may I suggest that you either disconnect your computer so the
anonymous space aliens don't bring your good name into disrepute with their
crank postings, OR, get yourself diagnosed for mad cow disease, or whatever
it is that is eating the grey matter where your faculties were?


"After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly decided
to repudiated and scapegoat him."
Anonymous Space Alien, using George's computer, 27 November 2003
from first message in thread titled BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly
Affair':
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=a38fb763.0311270222.113cd5de%40posting.google.com

vice

"No one ever suggested Barney Leith
repudicated DR Kelly's Bahai membership. "
An Entirely Different Space Alien who is also using George's computer, 1
December 2003

vice
> The Baha'i Faith has not, and will not "repudiate and scapegoat"
> Dr Kelly - on the contrary, they have said nothing against
> him.

"Yes they have"
Yet a Third Anonymous Space Alien responding to Paul Hammond 27 November
2003
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=a38fb763.0311271120.11b6e6cf%40posting.google.com

Probable Plonkster Pahooey!

Paul,

I've inferred from your follow-up to my follow-up, rather than to his
follow-up, that you have KFed the troll.  If no one else is responding to
him, I intend to ignore him as well.

Best wishes, all!
- Pat
kohli at ameritel.net

>
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 1/12/03 3:43 pm:
>
> > Pat Kohli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> >>> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 30/11/03 10:52 am:
> >>>
> >>>> This looks like another concession that there was NO scapegoating
> >>>> or repudiating to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> "We can confirm that Dr David Kelly, whose death was confirmed by
> the
> >>>>> police on Saturday afternoon was a registered Baha'i. He had
> become
> >>>>> a Baha'i in New York in 1999 and had been a member of the Vale
> of
> >>>>> White Horse community in Oxfordshire before the Local Assembly
> >>>>> boundary changes left him as an isolated believer."
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like "owning" to me.  Dr David Kelly WAS a Baha'i.  No
> >>>> dis-owning going on here!
> >>>
> >>> You are ignoring the most important part of that letter.
> >
> > Not at all.  How is this sensible approach to PR evidence
> > of "scapegoating and repudiating"?
> >
> > YOU are ignoring the most important part of the letter,
> > where it says:
> >
> >
> > WE CAN CONFIRM THAT DR DAVID KELLY... WAS A REGISTERED BAHA'I
> >
> > "We can confirm that Dr David Kelly, whose death was confirmed by the
> > police on Saturday afternoon was a registered Baha'i."
> >
> > This looks like "owning" to me.  Dr David Kelly WAS a Baha'i.
> > No dis-owning going on here!
> >
> > Just a reminder - this is the definition of repudiation:
> >
> > "REPUDIATE (v.t.) disown, disavow, reject; refuse dealings
> > with; deny; refuse to recognise or obey (authority
> > or treaty) or discharge (obligation or debt)"
> >
> > Please explain what evidence of "repudiation" you see, because
> > *this* is its opposite - "owning, avowing, accepting".
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >>
> >> Even so, the letter clearly _does_ claim that David Kelly was a
> Baha'i,
> >> precisely what it would _not_ do if David Kelly were being
> repudiated by
> >> the Baha'i Faith.
> >>
> >>>>>> We can confirm that Dr David Kelly, whose death
> >>>>>> was confirmed by the police on Saturday afternoon
> >>>>>> was a registered Baha'i.
> >> ....
> >>>>>> National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the UK
> >>>>>> Barney Leith, Secretary
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Errol
> >>>
> >>> "We are aware that quite a number of the friends have been
> approached
> >>> by journalists about Dr Kelly. We would ask that any further
> >>> approaches by the media should be referred to the National
> Secretary
> >>> or to Carmel Momen, our Public Information Officer in the Office
> of
> >>> Public Information on 020-7590 8785".
> >>>>
> >>>> Paul
> >>>>
> >>
> >> (snip)