Re: BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair

There simply is no "repudiating" or "scapegoating" going on
here whatsoever.

Do you actually understand these words you bandy about so
freely, Error?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pat Kohli at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/11/03 1:07 am:
> 
> > Barney says the meeting at the Kingdon's did address weapons inspection in
> > Iraq, but a) did not address the dossier, and b) it was not a Baha'i meeting,
> > though there were Baha'is there.
> 
> So the secretary of the UK NSA told Lord Hutton that  30 Bahai's, many
> who were members of the UK NSA all met in a Bahai's house, in October
> 2002 to listen to another Bahai Dr Kelly give a talk about WMDs in
> Iraq was not an **Administrative** Bahai organised meeting. Barney and
> you Pat can go tell that one to the marines.  Its a porky pie.
> 
> > As to the question of whether the meeting at the Kingdon's addressed the
> > dossier, both Barney and Roger agree that David Kelly spoke from slides.
> > Therefore, his slides from the talk would resolve whether or not 'the dossier'
> > was on the agenda.  It seems to me to be quite possible that David Kelly had
> > privately expressed some reservations about the dossier to Roger Kingdon, such
> > that this may have been completely correct, "Kelly expressed his unhappiness
> > with how the document was being interpreted, saying the intelligence
> > information supplied was accurate, but indicating that he was uncomfortable
> > about how it was being represented" w/o this unhappiness being expressed at
> > this meeting in Abingdon, or wherever it was.
> 
>  The meeting was very much organised by the Bahai AO. Dr Kelly would
> not have imposed himself on all those Baha'is unless he had been 
> *requested* to do so by the Bahai AO to give the talk at a Baha'i
> fireside.  Now because the subject which he also discussed with a BBC
> journalist over the september dossier and WMD's in Iraq, eventually
> led to his suicide, became *EMBARASSING* so Barney  decided to twist
> the story a bit  about what actually happened.
> 
> > Do let me know when you find the repudiation and scapegoating, 
> > George.  I'll try to remember to breathe through the suspense of the wait.
> 
> The Bahai AO acted no different than BBC journalist Andrew Gilligan.
> They like Gilligan requested to meet DR Kelly, not the other way
> round. Now the Bahai AO  want to distance themselves from that October
> 2002 meeting by repudiating and scapegoating Kelly that it was Kelly
> who approached them and acted all on his own  and the 30 Baha'is were
> all innocent (Three monkey) bystanders who heard no secrets, about the
> dossier, seen nothing wrong about the political situation. and said no
> things for or against Tony Blair and the British Government's actions
> in going to war with Iraq....................Errol
> 
> 
>  
> >