BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair

in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pat Kohli at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/11/03 1:07 am:

> Barney says the meeting at the Kingdon's did address weapons inspection in
> Iraq, but a) did not address the dossier, and b) it was not a Baha'i meeting,
> though there were Baha'is there.

So the secretary of the UK NSA told Lord Hutton that  30 Bahai's, many
who were members of the UK NSA all met in a Bahai's house, in October
2002 to listen to another Bahai Dr Kelly give a talk about WMDs in
Iraq was not an **Administrative** Bahai organised meeting. Barney and
you Pat can go tell that one to the marines.  Its a porky pie.

> As to the question of whether the meeting at the Kingdon's addressed the
> dossier, both Barney and Roger agree that David Kelly spoke from slides.
> Therefore, his slides from the talk would resolve whether or not 'the dossier'
> was on the agenda.  It seems to me to be quite possible that David Kelly had
> privately expressed some reservations about the dossier to Roger Kingdon, such
> that this may have been completely correct, "Kelly expressed his unhappiness
> with how the document was being interpreted, saying the intelligence
> information supplied was accurate, but indicating that he was uncomfortable
> about how it was being represented" w/o this unhappiness being expressed at
> this meeting in Abingdon, or wherever it was.

 The meeting was very much organised by the Bahai AO. Dr Kelly would
not have imposed himself on all those Baha'is unless he had been 
*requested* to do so by the Bahai AO to give the talk at a Baha'i
fireside.  Now because the subject which he also discussed with a BBC
journalist over the september dossier and WMD's in Iraq, eventually
led to his suicide, became *EMBARASSING* so Barney  decided to twist
the story a bit  about what actually happened.

> Do let me know when you find the repudiation and scapegoating, 
> George.  I'll try to remember to breathe through the suspense of the wait.

The Bahai AO acted no different than BBC journalist Andrew Gilligan.
They like Gilligan requested to meet DR Kelly, not the other way
round. Now the Bahai AO  want to distance themselves from that October
2002 meeting by repudiating and scapegoating Kelly that it was Kelly
who approached them and acted all on his own  and the 30 Baha'is were
all innocent (Three monkey) bystanders who heard no secrets, about the
dossier, seen nothing wrong about the political situation. and said no
things for or against Tony Blair and the British Government's actions
in going to war with Iraq....................Errol


 
>