Re: BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/11/03 3:33 am:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> >> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 11:38 pm:
> >> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> >>> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>>> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> >>>> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 3:44 pm:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> >>>>> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>>>>> BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'
> >>>>>> The Scotsman, UK - 6 hours ago
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> The head of the BBC has warned ministers not to try to change
>  the
>  way
> >>>>>> the corporation is regulated, insisting it was learning the
> >> lessons
> >> of
> >>>>>> the David Kelly affair. 
> >>>>>> http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2228606
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> I wonder if Barney Leith (Secretary of the UK NSA) was called
>  in
>  to
> >>>>>> give his advice after his exellent preformance at the Hutton
>  inquiry?
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly
>  decided
> >>>>>> to repudiated and scapegoat him. 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Are you STILL lying about this?
> >>>> 
> >>>> I am not the one who lied at the Hutton Inquiry.
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> No - you lie as naturally as you breath.
> >>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> The Baha'i Faith has not, and will not "repudiate and scapegoat"
> >>>>> Dr Kelly - on the contrary, they have said nothing against
> >>>>> him.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Yes they have
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> No they haven't.
> >>> 
> >>>>> Have you seen anything that says different?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Yes, here is the proof were one baha'is contradicts another.
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> I tell you what - you produce here the text where the Baha'is
> >>> "repudiated" or "scapegoated" Dr Kelly, and I will apologise to
> >>> you.
> >>> 
> >>> In the meantime, if you are still lying about what Dr Kelly
> >>> said, I will call you a worm.
> >>> 
> >>> Ok?
> >>> 
> >>> Produce the proof, or shut the fuck up. Okay?
> >>> 
> >>> Paul
> >> 
> >> Roger Kingdon versus Barney Leith's Account
> >> http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Kelly100502.htm 
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 
> >> NOTE WELL: Incredibly, many have accepted, without the slightest
> >> hesitation, suspicion, and, apparently, investigation, the claims
>  by
> >> the fundamentalists among my fellow baha'is regarding David Kelly's
> >> talk at the home of Geeta and Roger Kingdon. It should be carefully
> >> considered to what extent Barney Leith's July 20 letter prohibiting
> >> Baha'is from talking with the press influenced the comments here.
>  The
> >> timeline should also be carefully investigated since the
>  possibility
> >> exists that local Baha'is revealed that the October 2002 meeting
>  took
> >> place prior to Barney Leith's July 20 letter. Notice too that the
>  only
> >> Baha'i being interviewed by Lord Hutton is the author of that
> >> prohibition and Secretary of the UK NSA. Obviously, Barnabus Leith
>  and
> >> Roger Kingdon have very different accounts and only one can be the
> >> truth:
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > SCAPEGOATING?  REPUDIATING?  None of that here, liar.
> 
> Well then read it again, only this time open your eyes.....Errol

I've read it.  There is no scapegoating or repudiating
here.  Just more of your lies.

Paul