Re: Another little Baha'i cuckoo trick

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Susan when are you going to provide the evidence to support your
> statement that " The first World  Parliament of Religions was
> *dominated* by missionaries who believed their religion was the only
> way."
> 
> Did not this attack by missionaries come from outside  the "Parliament
> of religions" rather than from inside. So how could they *dominate*
> it?
> 
> Errol
> 

When are *you* going to provide proof that the 1893 conference
was a haven of "religious pluralism", prod bigot??

> 
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Susan Maneck
> at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 8:09 pm:
> 
> >> 
> >>> Bahaism does not believe in Religious pluralism. like the World
> >>> parliament of religions (founded 1893 ) does.
> >>> 
> > 
> > As usual George, you don't know what you are talking about. The first World
> > Parliament of Religions was dominated by missionaries who believed their
> > religion was the only way. Read Jessup's entire talk, rather than just the
> > snippet on Baha'u'llah and you will see what I mean. The missionaries were
> > rather appalled to see people like Vivekananda included. 
> > 
> > http://bahaistudies.net/susanmaneck/
> > Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
> > http://list.jccc.net/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=bahai-st
> > 
> >