Re: BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/11/03 3:33 am:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> >> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 11:38 pm:
> >> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> >>> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>>> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> >>>> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 3:44 pm:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> >>>>> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>>>>> BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'
> >>>>>> The Scotsman, UK - 6 hours ago
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> The head of the BBC has warned ministers not to try to change
>  the
>  way
> >>>>>> the corporation is regulated, insisting it was learning the
> >> lessons
> >> of
> >>>>>> the David Kelly affair. 
> >>>>>> http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2228606
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> I wonder if Barney Leith (Secretary of the UK NSA) was called
>  in
>  to
> >>>>>> give his advice after his exellent preformance at the Hutton
>  inquiry?
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly
>  decided
> >>>>>> to repudiated and scapegoat him. 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Are you STILL lying about this?
> >>>> 
> >>>> I am not the one who lied at the Hutton Inquiry.
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> No - you lie as naturally as you breath.
> >>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> The Baha'i Faith has not, and will not "repudiate and scapegoat"
> >>>>> Dr Kelly - on the contrary, they have said nothing against
> >>>>> him.

> >>>> 
> >>>> Yes they have
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> No they haven't.
> >>> 
> >>>>> Have you seen anything that says different?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Yes, here is the proof were one baha'is contradicts another.
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> I tell you what - you produce here the text where the Baha'is
> >>> "repudiated" or "scapegoated" Dr Kelly, and I will apologise to
> >>> you.
> >>> 
> >>> In the meantime, if you are still lying about what Dr Kelly
> >>> said, I will call you a worm.
> >>> 
> >>> Ok?
> >>> 
> >>> Produce the proof, or shut the fuck up. Okay?
> >>> 
> >>> Paul
> >> 
> >> Roger Kingdon versus Barney Leith's Account
> >> http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Kelly100502.htm 
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 
> >> NOTE WELL: Incredibly, many have accepted, without the slightest
> >> hesitation, suspicion, and, apparently, investigation, the claims
>  by
> >> the fundamentalists among my fellow baha'is regarding David Kelly's
> >> talk at the home of Geeta and Roger Kingdon. It should be carefully
> >> considered to what extent Barney Leith's July 20 letter prohibiting
> >> Baha'is from talking with the press influenced the comments here.
>  The
> >> timeline should also be carefully investigated since the
>  possibility
> >> exists that local Baha'is revealed that the October 2002 meeting
>  took
> >> place prior to Barney Leith's July 20 letter. Notice too that the
>  only
> >> Baha'i being interviewed by Lord Hutton is the author of that
> >> prohibition and Secretary of the UK NSA. Obviously, Barnabus Leith
>  and
> >> Roger Kingdon have very different accounts and only one can be the
> >> truth:
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > SCAPEGOATING?  REPUDIATING?  None of that here, liar.
> 
> Well then read it again, only this time open your eyes.....Errol


SCAPEGOATING?  REPUDIATING? Nope, none of that here, and I
have no need to read it again.  i saw plenty of this kind of
bollocks from you before Kelly was even cold in his grave.

Your lies have not changed, or somehow become more palatable in
the intervening months.

Paul