Re: BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'

Pat Kohli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'
> > The Scotsman, UK - 6 hours ago
> >
> > The head of the BBC has warned ministers not to try to change the way
> > the corporation is regulated, insisting it was learning the lessons of
> > the David Kelly affair.
> > http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2228606
> >
> > I wonder if Barney Leith (Secretary of the UK NSA) was called in to
> > give his advice after his exellent preformance at the Hutton inquiry?
> >
> > After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly decided
> > to repudiated and scapegoat him.
> 
> I don't see that the AO got any more out of David Kelly, in his life, than
> your typical Baha'i, certainly your continuous droning about his suicide
> and the fact of his religious affiliation, has probably generated unusual
> amounts of publicity for the BF, but I really doubt that the AO asked him
> to pioneer to some remote place, donate a million pounds, or, in any other
> way, tried to exploit him.  If I am wrong about this, please do show me
> some testimony, perhaps his wife's statement to Lord Hutton, which
> demonstrates that the AO exploited him.
> 
> I don't see much for repudiation or scapegoating.  For example, if the AO
> were to repudiate him, I'd have expected Barney to say that he really was
> _not_ a Baha'i.  I'm not aware of that.  Again, if you have some facts
> consistent with this charge, please do show it.
> 
> > Few long-time observers of my fellow
> > bahais
> 
> George, you have _no_ fellow Baha'is.  Since you've resigned you've been
> after the BF, referred to 'Abdu'l Baha as "noddy", and, of course,
> persisted in being yourself; if you are a Baha'i, you are alone.
> 

This is George reprinting what Fred says.  Fred still wants 
to *be* a bad bad bahooey.

Of course, Fred still has extracts from George's earlier
posts in his website, where he calls the way George used
to attack him "evidence of Baha'i hate-speech".

> > will believe for a second that the truth will be learned from
> > UK NSA member Barney Leith, who issued a letter on July 20 prohibiting
> > UK Baha'is from speaking to the media. His comments should be weighed
> > in the context of ESSENTIAL READING -
> 
> That appears puzzling.  If you say he is unreliable, why would you also
> say that his comments are Essential Reading - this seems inconsistent with
> your previous warning that he is unreliable.
> 
> > Two introductory articles on
> > Baha'i fundamentalism and censorship - See links below
> >
> > "Barney Leith, secretary of the National Spiritual assembly of
> > Britain, who knew Dr Kelly and will testify before the Hutton inquiry
> > about the impact of the Baha'i faith had on him, said he could not
> > know whether the scientist might have taken his own life because of
> > guilt. But he added: "The teachings of the Baha'i faith strongly
> > emphasise the importance of ... keeping one's word."
> > http://politics.guardian.co.uk/kelly/story/0,13747,1027373,00.html
> >
> > EVIDENCE grows... Dr. David Kelly & the Baha'i Faith
> > http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Kelly.htm
> 
> Fred's web site?  But you say that Barney is unreliable?

Error also thinks that Dr Kelly has been called a traitor
in the mainstream media, and not only in his imagination,
because there was a Blake's 7 episode called "Traitor"
in Season four of that excellent TV series.

Go figure.

Paul