BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'

in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/11/03 3:33 am:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
>> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 11:38 pm:
>> 
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
>>> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>>> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
>>>> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 3:44 pm:
>>>> 
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
>>>>> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>>>>> BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'
>>>>>> The Scotsman, UK - 6 hours ago
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The head of the BBC has warned ministers not to try to change
the
>> way
>>>>>> the corporation is regulated, insisting it was learning the
>> lessons
>> of
>>>>>> the David Kelly affair. 
>>>>>> http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2228606
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I wonder if Barney Leith (Secretary of the UK NSA) was called
in
>> to
>>>>>> give his advice after his exellent preformance at the Hutton
>> inquiry?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly
>> decided
>>>>>> to repudiated and scapegoat him. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you STILL lying about this?
>>>> 
>>>> I am not the one who lied at the Hutton Inquiry.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> No - you lie as naturally as you breath.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> The Baha'i Faith has not, and will not "repudiate and scapegoat"
>>>>> Dr Kelly - on the contrary, they have said nothing against
>>>>> him.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes they have
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> No they haven't.
>>> 
>>>>> Have you seen anything that says different?
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, here is the proof were one baha'is contradicts another.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I tell you what - you produce here the text where the Baha'is
>>> "repudiated" or "scapegoated" Dr Kelly, and I will apologise to
>>> you.
>>> 
>>> In the meantime, if you are still lying about what Dr Kelly
>>> said, I will call you a worm.
>>> 
>>> Ok?
>>> 
>>> Produce the proof, or shut the fuck up. Okay?
>>> 
>>> Paul
>> 
>> Roger Kingdon versus Barney Leith's Account
>> http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Kelly100502.htm 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> NOTE WELL: Incredibly, many have accepted, without the slightest
>> hesitation, suspicion, and, apparently, investigation, the claims
by
>> the fundamentalists among my fellow baha'is regarding David Kelly's
>> talk at the home of Geeta and Roger Kingdon. It should be carefully
>> considered to what extent Barney Leith's July 20 letter prohibiting
>> Baha'is from talking with the press influenced the comments here.
The
>> timeline should also be carefully investigated since the
possibility
>> exists that local Baha'is revealed that the October 2002 meeting
took
>> place prior to Barney Leith's July 20 letter. Notice too that the
only
>> Baha'i being interviewed by Lord Hutton is the author of that
>> prohibition and Secretary of the UK NSA. Obviously, Barnabus Leith
and
>> Roger Kingdon have very different accounts and only one can be the
>> truth:
>> 
>> 
> 
> SCAPEGOATING?  REPUDIATING?  None of that here, liar.

Well then read it again, only this time open your eyes.....Errol
> 
> Paul