Re: BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 11:38 pm:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> >> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 3:44 pm:
> >> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> >>> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>>> BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'
> >>>> The Scotsman, UK - 6 hours ago
> >>>> 
> >>>> The head of the BBC has warned ministers not to try to change the
>  way
> >>>> the corporation is regulated, insisting it was learning the
>  lessons
>  of
> >>>> the David Kelly affair. 
> >>>> http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2228606
> >>>> 
> >>>> I wonder if Barney Leith (Secretary of the UK NSA) was called in
>  to
> >>>> give his advice after his exellent preformance at the Hutton
>  inquiry?
> >>>> 
> >>>> After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly
>  decided
> >>>> to repudiated and scapegoat him. 
> >>> 
> >>> Are you STILL lying about this?
> >> 
> >> I am not the one who lied at the Hutton Inquiry.
> >> 
> > 
> > No - you lie as naturally as you breath.
> > 
> >> 
> >>> The Baha'i Faith has not, and will not "repudiate and scapegoat"
> >>> Dr Kelly - on the contrary, they have said nothing against
> >>> him.
> >> 
> >> Yes they have
> >> 
> > 
> > No they haven't.
> > 
> >>> Have you seen anything that says different?
> >> 
> >> Yes, here is the proof were one baha'is contradicts another.
> >> 
> > 
> > I tell you what - you produce here the text where the Baha'is
> > "repudiated" or "scapegoated" Dr Kelly, and I will apologise to
> > you.
> > 
> > In the meantime, if you are still lying about what Dr Kelly
> > said, I will call you a worm.
> > 
> > Ok?
> > 
> > Produce the proof, or shut the fuck up. Okay?
> > 
> > Paul
> 
> Roger Kingdon versus Barney Leith's Account
> http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Kelly100502.htm 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> NOTE WELL: Incredibly, many have accepted, without the slightest
> hesitation, suspicion, and, apparently, investigation, the claims by
> the fundamentalists among my fellow baha'is regarding David Kelly's
> talk at the home of Geeta and Roger Kingdon. It should be carefully
> considered to what extent Barney Leith's July 20 letter prohibiting
> Baha'is from talking with the press influenced the comments here. The
> timeline should also be carefully investigated since the possibility
> exists that local Baha'is revealed that the October 2002 meeting took
> place prior to Barney Leith's July 20 letter. Notice too that the only
> Baha'i being interviewed by Lord Hutton is the author of that
> prohibition and Secretary of the UK NSA. Obviously, Barnabus Leith and
> Roger Kingdon have very different accounts and only one can be the
> truth:
> 
>  

SCAPEGOATING?  REPUDIATING?  None of that here, liar.

Paul