Re: BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'
> The Scotsman, UK - 6 hours ago
>
> The head of the BBC has warned ministers not to try to change the way
> the corporation is regulated, insisting it was learning the lessons of
> the David Kelly affair.
> http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2228606
>
> I wonder if Barney Leith (Secretary of the UK NSA) was called in to
> give his advice after his exellent preformance at the Hutton inquiry?
>
> After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly decided
> to repudiated and scapegoat him.

I don't see that the AO got any more out of David Kelly, in his life, than
your typical Baha'i, certainly your continuous droning about his suicide
and the fact of his religious affiliation, has probably generated unusual
amounts of publicity for the BF, but I really doubt that the AO asked him
to pioneer to some remote place, donate a million pounds, or, in any other
way, tried to exploit him.  If I am wrong about this, please do show me
some testimony, perhaps his wife's statement to Lord Hutton, which
demonstrates that the AO exploited him.

I don't see much for repudiation or scapegoating.  For example, if the AO
were to repudiate him, I'd have expected Barney to say that he really was
_not_ a Baha'i.  I'm not aware of that.  Again, if you have some facts
consistent with this charge, please do show it.

> Few long-time observers of my fellow
> bahais

George, you have _no_ fellow Baha'is.  Since you've resigned you've been
after the BF, referred to 'Abdu'l Baha as "noddy", and, of course,
persisted in being yourself; if you are a Baha'i, you are alone.

> will believe for a second that the truth will be learned from
> UK NSA member Barney Leith, who issued a letter on July 20 prohibiting
> UK Baha'is from speaking to the media. His comments should be weighed
> in the context of ESSENTIAL READING -

That appears puzzling.  If you say he is unreliable, why would you also
say that his comments are Essential Reading - this seems inconsistent with
your previous warning that he is unreliable.

> Two introductory articles on
> Baha'i fundamentalism and censorship - See links below
>
> "Barney Leith, secretary of the National Spiritual assembly of
> Britain, who knew Dr Kelly and will testify before the Hutton inquiry
> about the impact of the Baha'i faith had on him, said he could not
> know whether the scientist might have taken his own life because of
> guilt. But he added: "The teachings of the Baha'i faith strongly
> emphasise the importance of ... keeping one's word."
> http://politics.guardian.co.uk/kelly/story/0,13747,1027373,00.html
>
> EVIDENCE grows... Dr. David Kelly & the Baha'i Faith
> http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Kelly.htm

Fred's web site?  But you say that Barney is unreliable?