Re: BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/11/03 3:44 pm:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> BBC 'Learning the Lessons of the Kelly Affair'
> >> The Scotsman, UK - 6 hours ago
> >> 
> >> The head of the BBC has warned ministers not to try to change the
>  way
> >> the corporation is regulated, insisting it was learning the lessons
>  of
> >> the David Kelly affair. 
> >> http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2228606
> >> 
> >> I wonder if Barney Leith (Secretary of the UK NSA) was called in to
> >> give his advice after his exellent preformance at the Hutton
>  inquiry?
> >> 
> >> After USING David Kelly, the bahai administration has clearly
>  decided
> >> to repudiated and scapegoat him. 
> > 
> > Are you STILL lying about this?
> 
> I am not the one who lied at the Hutton Inquiry.
> 

No - you lie as naturally as you breath.

> 
> > The Baha'i Faith has not, and will not "repudiate and scapegoat"
> > Dr Kelly - on the contrary, they have said nothing against
> > him.
> 
> Yes they have
>

No they haven't.
 
> > Have you seen anything that says different?
> 
> Yes, here is the proof were one baha'is contradicts another.
> 

I tell you what - you produce here the text where the Baha'is
"repudiated" or "scapegoated" Dr Kelly, and I will apologise to
you.

In the meantime, if you are still lying about what Dr Kelly
said, I will call you a worm.

Ok?

Produce the proof, or shut the fuck up. Okay?

Paul