Re: What attributes? Yours Jerry

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Jerry Joplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Rod wrote:
> > > Jerry Joplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Then some attacks are against the community and the faith.    What
> > >>attributes of an attack makes it an attack on both the community and the
> > >>faith?
> > > 
> > > Baseless/fabricated attacks on community members by community members
> > > would constitute an attack on basic Baha'i principles, especially if
> > > justification,
> > > explanation and substantiation was sought by the accused and refused by the
> > > accuser.
> > 
> > <Irrelevant invectives snipped>
> 
> "How would the falsely accused Baha'u'llah feel about your false allegation."
> 
> You cut this question and His name and call it "invective"?
> 

He does that all the time.

Here is another cut paragraph from your last response to Jerry:

"Yes. when you misrepresent what I have said, lie and commit forgery in
regard
what others have said, then obfuscate and evaded all attempts to encourage
you to explain yourself you go further than simply embarrassing the faith
and
shameing yourself............you commit an act of violence to core Baha'i
principles.
You attack the faith and all that it stands for."

The only "invective" I can find in the 5 missing paragraphs
of your post was the word "dickhead", and it is a matter
of Jerry's opinion that that epithet applied to himself
is "irrelevant".

Seems like another example of misrepresentation to me, when
5 thoughtful and cogent paragraphs, directly bearing on
the proper Baha'i way to respond to false accusations
can be summarily dismissed as "irrlevant invective"


> > 
> > Some attacks on Baha'i principles are then attacks on the faith, correct 
> > Rod?
> 
> Yours clearly are and I have stated why.

And, surprise surprise, he has ignored that, and thinks that
after he has attacked *you* as an "enemy of the Baha'i
Faith", then *you* have to provide the justification for
that attack yourself "I have asked you a hundred times
what attributes of an attack on the community make it
an attack on the whole of the Baha'i Faith".

My question is, why is it your job to help Janis prove
his own allegation against you?  Can't he see how
ridiculous he's being?

Paul