Re: For Suzan : About islamic marriage

Pat Kohli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Rod wrote:
> 
> > Dam! I saw the Header and I thought Susan was on her way to Kuwait
> > with a dowry of six goats, a 1924 Hudson gear stick and a recipe for
> > Cous Cous.
> 
> I'd like to apologize to all Muslims who may be reading this, 

So you should, attempting to extrapolate a dig at Susan into a
dig at Islam.

Why don't you drop a Joplin and pretend I have attacked the
whole Islamic Faith, the Prophet and Allah?

Who knew Piths- 'Ladder Theory Theology' would spread so far. 


> Not everyone who posts here feels towards Islam the way
> that the remarks above suggest.

In fact *nobody* expressed any 'feelings towards Islam'.

But everybody wishes Susan would take her goats and go.

 
> Rod, maybe you could go back to making up things that Susan has accused you
> of,

Given your 'Drive By' tactic of flinging lies from moving posts 
and never stoping to defend or justify your position- one can only
assume you are referring to Susan's 'enemy of the faith' innuendo that
you identified at the time as exactly what transpired on Bnet. 
So if I imagined/made it up- you shared and confirmed the
hallucination.


> and insulting me?

Ok, if you consider the truth insulting. You're a hypocrite Pat.
 You saw what Susan said, identified it for what it was and called her
out over it. When Susan launched into unexplained and unjustified ad
hom (paranoid, jackass, nasty, obnoxious) I eventually embraced her no
rules policy and pursued her and the allegation. This pursuit you deem
to be 'hounding' and claim
it negates the original allegation recognised by both of us.

You assert that Baha'is do in fact defend on principle when community
members are falsely attacked online, you provide links to support this
proposition&, each of your links (bar one) demonstrates that Baha'is
DO
NOT challenge or object to serious online allegations. You
subsequently confirm this preparedness to turn a blind eye by your own
behaviour.

Your sense of justice is partisan in the extreme, you cannot act
on principle (Baha'i or otherwise)
You backflip and deny what you yourself had observed.
You make claims that cannot be substantiated and offer substantiation
that cannot withstand scrutiny.
You once stood as someone prepared to discuss and debate an issue,
now you fling invented muck and run, evading the issues at every turn.
 
> I don't recall you saying that she has accused you of being the
> reincarnation of Atila the Hun, or Adolph Hitler. 

Why invent spurious allegations when there are abundant substantive
ones on the table?
Why do you take time out to consider what Susan hasn't said when
we have a clear record of what she (and others) have said?
Why do you flee real issues to consider straw men? 

You yourself trace the bunfight with Susan to the point at
which I use the invectives 'furphy' and 'red herring' (to
start a fight?) and then you propose this drove her to tell me
to %^$&*^% off in the nicest way.
What stuns me is that you do not even appear embarresed
by the bullshit you put forward. 


> You have not yet accused me of eating babies live. 

No need for such invention and exaggeration Pat.
You eat the truth alive, chew it up and spit out lies.
You accuse me of 'starting fights' but in true Manic form
you run and refuse to offer any substantiation.
You just make 'noise' Pat.

The core vital distinction between you (Susan, Jerry) and
I is that I will forewarn someone before I am uncivil and
always subsequently explain why I have been so.

You pseudo Baha'i pretenders employ all manner of innuendo,
lie and allegation and it would take explosives up your arse
to EVER get you to explain or defend your bullshit.

Yours is totally UNBaha'i, unethical, hypocritical cowardice


> These are just ideas,

That's right Pat, *your ideas*, invented crap, based on nothing
founded on nothing but your own imagination.


> I'm sure you'll do better.

I always do Pat, whatever I say to you or about you is based on
the post evidence and I always stand prepared to back and 
substantiate what I say.
I'm also scrupulous in responding to your every point, no matter
how inane and spurious your remarks are. Watch again-

> BTW, would you be so kind as to lay off of insulting religions, particularly
> on their own holy days?  

Sure Pat, you come up with a post in which I have "insulted" a 
religion and I will give it some thought.
Untill then... would you be so kind as to stop insulting my
intelligence
and fundamental Baha'i principles with your exclusive concentration
on invented/imagined issues while you turn a blind eye to real and 
serious abuse from your Baha'i appologist mates?


> Toodles!


What? Time for you to roar off and hide again?

Cowardice and hypocrisy.. once upon a time you at least made lip
service to ethical/principled behaviour now you have sunk to the
Effy/Pith/Dust/Jerry level...beneath contempt.

Next time you wanna try a Drive By take aim, you might hit something
...and try using shit that will stick to something other than your
own hands.