Re: Riddle me this Batman!

"Rod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Jerry Joplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Paul Hammond wrote:
> > > From Rod's post yesterday:
> > >
> > > Once more-
> > > An attack on the Baha'i community prompted by and
> > > designed to discredit/damage the writings, the central figures
> > > or the institutions would be an example of an attack on both
> > > community and faith.
> >
> > As mentioned, it doesn't explain why attacks on the Iranian Baha'i
> > community are attacks on the whole of the Baha'i Faith.
> 
> No such explanation was requested.
> No such explanation is relevant to your accusation.
> No 'attack" on the community (let alone faith) has been established.
> 

No that's right - it is a much more general definition
of how an attack on the Baha'i community can also have
the attributes of an attack on the Baha'i Faith - an
exact answer to the exact question that Jerry asked
you.

As yet, Jerry has yet to establish any relevance of
this "garden path" defence - a judge would be telling
him to cut to the chase by now.

Jerry, at what point did Rod attack the "whole of
the Baha'i Faith", as you alleged two and a half
weeks ago now, with as yet, no justification, and
no apology for making a false accusation???

Paul