Re: "I may be the new David Kelly but I have every intention of staying alive."

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
> Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/11/03 10:59 pm:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> Craig Murray  Britain's ambassador to Uzbekistan said: 
> >> "I may be the new David Kelly but I have every intention of staying
> >> alive."
> >> 
> > 
> > So what?
> 
> Are you inherently unable to give any response other than
> a childish foot-stamp?

Are you inherently unable to write your own responses?

This guy, Murray, is in a situation that has nothing
to do with WMDs, or dossiers, or David Kelly, but
he has found himself in a position which has somehow
caused embarrasment to the UK government

ie - But his public condemnation of Uzbekistan's government created a
rift within Britain's political establishment that ran along the
fissures that developed over the war on Iraq. Murray recognised this,
and commented while recuperating in Scotland, "I may be the new David
Kelly but I have every intention of staying alive."

But, just because he compares himself to Kelly, you
decide to post the story here.

Once again, I am left wondering whether you ever bother
to actually *read* any of the articles you post links
to here.

So, answer the question - this guy makes an analogy between
himself and Kelly, although actually, being the victim of
a smear campaign by the Uzbeks and criticising the
human rights record of the Uzbek government has
nothing to do with the Kelly situation. 

This guy has been re-appointed - So what?

Paul

Paul