Re: Assemblies sworn to secrecy?

This has been true for some time (six months or so?).  I think it is to help
them deal with future lawsuits.  However it seems to me that such members
were already bound by such rules, just that now they have to sign away their
lives and freedom.

Cheers, Randy

-- 

"Cal E. Rollins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I just heard from a couple of sources that Local Spiritual Assembly and
> Regional Council members now have to sign an affidavit that they will
> abide by confidentially requirements.  Is this true?
>
> Do you think the proliferation of suits and threats of such have
> required the National to do this?
>
> Are the Board Members and Councillors also bound by secrecy?  We do know
> of such who spill their guts about individual Baha'is, so they must not
> be bound by the same requirements that lesser administrators are.  --Cal
>