Re: Some UNanswered questions #6

"Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> 5. Why did the newly elected UHJ that now sits in Haifa consult with the
> Hands when there is no support in the Writings providing for the UHJ to
> consult with the Hands or gives them a position of authority over the
> Universal House of Justice?

By 1963, the arrogance of the Custodial Hands was in full swing.  They could
not have their UHJ consulting without them present to make sure that the UHJ
did not stray from the script that the Hands had secretly written for them.
The Hands were ROYALTY, after all.  They were in charge.  The UHJ was the
proleteriat and had to be kept in line and in service to the Hands.


>
> 36. How come, in the Will and Testament, it says that the "guardian of the
> Cause of God" is the "sacred head and the distinguished member for life of
> that body [the Universal House of Justice] but the UHJ now sitting in
Haifa
> does not have a guardian or anyone else as its head and has no member for
> life?

The answer is obvious!  The so-called UHJ now sitting in Haifa is NOT the
UHJ found in the Will and Testament. They are completely different entities.
The one now in Haifa is a Handmade, manmade headless beast.  The one in the
Will and Testament is part of the Divine Government created by God.

> 37. Why is it, that, although the Will and Testament says that the
guardian
> will have the power to expel a member of the Universal House of Justice
from
> that body if the member should "commit a sin injurious to the common
weal,"
> the UHJ now sitting in Haifa does not have a guardian to perform this
> function, but instead the UHJ now performs this function for itself?

Without a Guardian, the members of the UHJ can commit sins like crazy.
There is nobody to stop them.


> 38. Why is it that, under the terms of the Will and Testament, the Huquq
is
> to be offered through the Guardian, yet the UHJ now sitting in Haifa
demands
> and accepts the Huquq instead?

They are stealing God's money.  I believe there is a special hell reserved
for people who steal the Huquq.

I believe you will be called to account one day. If I were one of the
so-called Huquq Trustees, I would be worried.


> 39. How could the UHJ now sitting in Haifa review the Guardian's
appointment
> of his successor and decide whether it would accept Shoghi Effendi's
> appointment when the Will and Testament of 'Abdul-Baha does not give the
> Universal House of Justice the power to countermand the Guardian's
> appointment of his successor, or even to investigate the processes by
which
> the Guardian chooses his successor?

I guess the Master must have mistakenly left that out of His Will, huh?  You
know, the part about the UHJ being supreme over the Guardian and deciding
whether and who the Guardian can appoint as his successor.  Wake up, my
fellow believers!


> 40. How can the UHJ function without a guardian to provide authorized
> interpretation's of Bahá'í Writings in light of the statement by Shoghi
> Effendi that, while he guardian "cannot override the decision of the
> majority of his fellow-members, [he] is bound to insist upon a
> reconsideration by them of any enactment he conscientiously believes to
> conflict with the meaning and to depart from the spirit of Baha'u'llah's
> revealed utterances."

Hmmm.... I can think of two solutions.  Cloning of Shoghi Effendi or perhaps
a seance.


> 41. If there is no living Guardian of the Faith to provide direction, how
> does one interpret Shoghi Effendi's statement that the Guardian provides
> "the necessary guidance to define the sphere of the legislative action of
> its [the UHJ's] elected representatives"?

If there was one glaring obvious error in the Haifa organization is their
UHJ's constant sermonizing about the Holy Texts-- what the UHJ has decided
they mean, and how everybody must accept their interpretation.  If there
ever was an organization that really NEEDED a Guardian, it was this one.


> to be continued...
>
>