Re: Believer Beware- Turf War

Jerry Joplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Paul Hammond wrote:
> > You were the one telling us that Rod's remarks were
> > offensive to you, and putting me and Rod in a list
> > along with Nima and Darrick.
> > 
> > Yes or no question - do you consider Rod to be an
> > enemy of the faith?
> 
> No.
> 
> > If so, why?
> > 
> > If not, why are you treating him like one?
> 
> Define how one treats an "enemy of the faith" and there will be some 
> basis for a further discussion.
> 

You have accused Rod of making an attack on the "whole Baha'i
Faith", and also included his name, and my own, in a list of
self-declared enemies of the faith.

I think your views are sufficiently clear.

Now, you can either try to support your own argument, or
you can report Rod to the OZ NSA.  Whatever.

> > I'm not following any more of your diversions until
> > you justify your characterisation of Rod as an
> > "inveterate attacker of the whole Baha'i Faith".
> 
> Putting that within quotes implies I actually said the statement, Paul. 
>   I never said it.   At this point I should probably scream about you 
> mischaracterizing and misquoting with some expletive deleteds mixed 
> among them so you're capable of understanding it, but I'm not, so its 
> left for you to figure out.
> 

You're right.  You didn't actually use the word "inveterate".

My apologies for this.

OTOH, I have already reproduced the exact quotes where you
accused Rod of "Attacking the whole Baha'i Faith", and
also the one where you said "an attack on the Baha'i
Community is an attack on the Baha'i Faith".

Your response has been to ignore that post, and backtrack
at full speed.

Any chance you'll start debating like a man at this
stage? 

Or are we to expect more mealy-mouthed whining and
excerpts from the herring farm?

I await your response with hardly baited breath.

Paul