Re: Castration.

Greg wrote:
> Ann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:37:00 GMT, "Cesariana Oveila Hysterectum"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > "Yin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > > What do you think about castration for sex offenses?  I heared it
> > > > reduces recedivism to 3%.  Should it be used instead of prison or
> > > > along with it?
> > >
> > > Better question might be: Do you support castration of those who file false
> > > sex abuse allegations, if the sentence you propose became law?
> >
> > Why would that be a *better* question?  It's simply a different one.
>
>
> Almost any question is better than a question of whether men should be
> castrated.  Next.
>
>
>
> > > What compensation should the state provide to those falsely convicted? The
> > > FBI found (by going back to old cases with new DNA science) that fully a
> > > third of those in prison for sex abuse offenses were innocent.
> >
> > And this is a different one again.  Do you have a view on the question
> > asked?
>
>
> Probably not.  No civilized human being _should_ have a view on such
> ridiculously misandric question.

I favor defenestration for feminitwits who propose castration for men.