Re: The REAL Victim

"Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "P Diddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Damn right a new post so all you can read it, I don't care if I
shouldn't...
> > it's what I did. Now I know some people are dealing with SPECIFICS, and
you
> > probably already covered this, but let's cover it again ok? We are NOT
> > talking about raped woman, that's ANOTHER thread. This post is about
> > innocent MEN.
>
> I feel your pain.  I understand your frustration.  No matter how
> clearly you define your subject, and no matter how concisely you state
> your opinion on that subject, there are always people who will talk
> their way around it with side issues, red herrings, straw men, and
> generally inane chatter.
>
> And you may wonder why they bother?  Why do they not respond directly
> to your opinion?  Because they can't, and they don't really want you.
> Their goal is to shame you for taking pro-male stand, and they use
> muddled language to disguise their shaming as argument.
>
> "The great enemy of clear language is insincerity.  When there is a
> gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were
> instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish
> squirting out ink."
>      - George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language"
>
> You'll never get them to write clearly or to address your argument
> directly.  It's like herding cats.  Just ignore them.  Find the few
> people who actually do address your point, and develop conversations
> with them.  The rest are noise.


Yeah....I appreciate your post....thanks.
>
> [...]