Re: Strong evidence of the rarity of false rape accusations

"Alan Mackenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

> Quite simply, there have been very few victims of such accusations
> posting here on t.r.  In fact, I cannot recall a single one in nearly
> five years of posting here.  Not even in the crossposted threads from
> soc.men, where one would expect such to appear.

That doesn't stand for much, I guess. You seem to regard this talk group (or
Usenet in general) as the heart of the world, but I'm quite sure it isn't.

Whatever the case may be, it's rather foolish to label any reference (or
lack of reference) in this marginal newsgroup as "strong evidence", don't
you think?

DLK

http://www.mybluenotes.tk

"Women might be able to fake orgasms. But men can fake whole relationships."
-- Jimmy Shubert


> The nearest to it was an account from Misty, one of whose acquaintances
> was such a victim.  But he wasn't convicted, not even charged - the
> police investigated the allegations against him conscientiously and found
> them groundless (so much for always believing the rape "victim") and
> dropped the case.  His losses were financial only (though apparently
> quite considerable).
>
> So, where are all these victims of FRAs?  Why are they not posting here?
> I mean, we've even had a rapist (a credible one, that is, not a crude
> troll) posting here.  Have any FRA victims been posting on soc.men?
>
> This all suggests to me that FRAs are rare indeed, much rarer than rapes.
>
> --
> Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter
> (like "aa"), remove half of them (leaving, say, "a").
>